106

News

Groundwater in Danish capital at risk of contamination

Lucie Rychla
February 12th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Capital Region prefers to remove water pollutants from less densely-populated areas

Groundwater in Copenhagen and Frederiksberg may be at risk of contamination, claim the two municipalities.

The Capital Region has decided to bypass the two municipalities in their effort to rid the region of pollutants from old factories, gas stations and laundries, reports Ingeniøren newspaper.

Over the next 10 years, these pollutants may be absorbed into the soil and contaminate groundwater, the municipalities contend.

Too expensive
The Capital Region says Copenhagen and Frederiksberg are the most densely populated municipalities in the region and removing the potential sources of pollution would be too expensive.

According to the environment and transport committee in the Capital Region, it would cost 20 times more to clean Frederiksberg alone than west Zealand and it has decided to start the remediation process in low-cost areas in order to secure as much groundwater as quickly as possible.

READ MORE: Less fertiliser has benefited Denmark’s groundwater

Drinking water
According to the Capital Region, it takes about 20-40 years for a raindrop to seep into the groundwater, but many of the pollutants that the region is aware of, are already 30-40 years old.

Both municipalities have officially complained to the Capital Region and are hoping that the two cities will be prioritised.

“In worst case, we would have to get drinking water from somewhere else”, said Jan Jørgensen, the chairman of the committee for urbanisation and environment at the Frederiksberg Municipality.

Hansen noted that getting drinking water from elsewhere would have significant environmental and economic consequences.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”