130

News

Danish minister accused of misleading parliament on MRSA

TheCopenhagenPost
January 31st, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Eva Kjer Hansen, the environment and food minister, said the Norwegian MRSA policy was not working

Eva Kjer Hansen, the environment and food minister, addressed a parliamentary group on January 14 and explained why Denmark was not following Norway’s example of exterminating infected herds. But she is now being accused of misrepresenting the success of Norway’s policies, DR reports.

“In Norway they have put down herds in large numbers. This has actually not helped them. The MRSA has come back. So I do not think that this is a viable option,” she told the parliamentary group.

Norwegian research
But according to figures from the Norwegian veterinary institute Veterinærinstituttet, in 24 out of 26 cases of herds being exterminated, the bacteria has been eliminated and has not returned in subsequent test results.

Carl Andreas Grøntvedt, a researcher at Veterinærinstituttet, characterises his country’s efforts as a success.

“In more than 90 percent of cases, extermination has been successful first time, and the herds have been free of MRSA ever since,” he said.

“I am proud of the action being taken in Norway.”

Misleading parliament?
It was Maria Reumert Gjerding, Enhedslisten’s agricultural spokesperson, who initially called for Hansen to speak before the parliamentary group, and in light of the Norwegian research, she believes that the minister made misleading statements.

“I find Eva Kjer Hansen’s statements reprehensible. She argues to parliament that the Norwegian policy isn’t working, but the opposite is true. This shows that Denmark should do exactly the same and exterminate infected herds,” she said.

Hansen herself declined to comment, but Per Henriksen, the veterinary director at the food agency Fødevarestyrelsen, argued that the figures do not justify a change to Denmark’s approach.

“A relapse rate of nearly ten percent is too high. Norway has completely different pork production from Denmark, which has many and large herds, so we should expect a greater relapse rate in intensive Danish pork production,” he said.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”