271

News

Danish shoe designer is taking the fashion world by storm

Shifa Rahaman
January 25th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Her beautiful shoes feature a patent-pending insole system that ensures all-day comfort

Sure, they may be sexy and comfortable – but are they good at fending off unwanted advances? (Photo: Sargossa)

If you love the look of stilettos but cannot face the thought of braving the pain by actually walking in a pair, a 28-year-old Danish designer who is based in London may have the answer to your problem.

These stilettos were made for walking
Nanna Liv has taken the fashion world by storm with a line of stilettos that are both beautiful and comfortable.

Calling herself a ‘nobody’, Nanna saw a gap in the market and rushed to fill it with her innovative ideas. She now owns the company Sargossa and has seven employees and a worldwide network of distributors. She also plans to open dedicated Sargossa stores in the near future.

“I followed my intuition. Of course, I also listened to feedback, but I followed my own idea,” she told the Danish fashion magazine ALT.

Sexy, comfortable 
Nanna, who is driven by her belief that women should be able to choose footwear that is both sexy and comfortable, thinks male shoe designers have so far missed the memo.

“The biggest men in the shoe business often think more of the sexy element of shoes. They believe the foot should roughly match the shoe [and not the other way around]. But for my shoes, that is reversed,” she said.

The shoes, which took years to develop as Nanna searched for the perfect components to make her patent-pending insoles, are comfortable enough to wear all day – without leading to pesky problems such as aching backs, sore knees and bleeding ankles. It also doesn’t hurt that as far as their appearance is concerned they’re more Jimmy Choo than Dr Scholl’s.

As to her future plans, Nanna has very definite ideas.

“I clearly have a plan to grow and I’m not going to stand still. I do not measure my success in relation to my neighbour, but in relation to myself and my own expectations and ambitions,” she said.

“Some 80 to 90 percent of my waking time is spent at Sargossa, and I have not been on a long holiday for several years. But I love it, and my boyfriend and I often sit and talk about work and inspire each other.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”