113

Opinion

The Valley of Life: Laurels in the longer term
Søren Bregenholt

January 24th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Life science research and development is a high-risk endurance race. Developing new drugs takes a long time and is very costly. It may take up to 15 years from the first ideas until new molecules are identified, developed, manufactured and finally available as new medicines to help patients with serious diseases.

Not for the faint-hearted
Often times this process is preceded by decades of basic research. Investments in life science are not only long-term and sizeable, they are inherently risky, as only a few ideas will make it all the way to the patients.

On top of this, you are likely to race against equally motivated and skilled competitors. As in other industries, in order to win the race and get the laurels, you either have to be first on the market or develop the better product. Achieving both is a scoop.

Life science is not an industry for the shortsighted and fainted-hearted, but when you succeed, the returns can be significant for the patients, society and for the company that took the risk.

A success story
In Denmark and Greater Copenhagen, we are uniquely positioned with strong academic institutions, a highly-skilled workforce and world-class industry.

In the past, races have been won and laurels received. The industry has been able to leverage, and we have developed both better treatments for patients and generated substantial growth and a number of high-income jobs in the region.

No resting on laurels
Winning once is hard, but continuing to win is very difficult. You need to stay hungry, focused and think long-term – not rest on your laurels.

To be in the life science race you have to be willing to continue investing in what fosters the success: high-quality education, world-class academic research and new project ideas to bring future patients benefits, and growth and prosperity to the region.

The industry is as ready as ever for this endurance race. There is nothing we would rather do than invest in future medicines. And we hope that our politicians will race with us in order to bring home the next laurels.

 

 

About

Søren Bregenholt

As the chairman of the Medicon Valley Alliance – the gold-labelled Danish-Swedish life science cluster organisation – Søren will address current trends and challenges in the sector.  Away from the alliance, he is responsible for Novo Nordisk’s global R&D-based PhD and post doc programs, as well as research, innovation and educational policy.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”