98

News

Trade union 3F publishes Denmark’s first workplace injury rankings

TheCopenhagenPost
January 15th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Expert: Companies appearing on the list can be the result of a high accident rate or diligent reporting

The trade union publication Fagbladet 3F has for the first time produced a list of the companies in Denmark where the most work-related injuries are sustained, and some of Denmark’s most prominent companies have the dubious honour of being included.

Peter Hasle, a professor at the Center for Industrial Production at Aalborg University, said that when reviewing the rankings it is sometimes necessary to look more closely at the figures.

“Some companies will certainly have more injuries, but there can also be some that are good at getting work-related injuries registered,” he said.

Danish Crown: we have interest in reducing injuries
The country’s biggest slaughterhouse company Danish Crown was number nine on the list. According to the figures published, which are based on data collected for all reported workplace injuries between 2012 and 2014, there is a 5 percent chance of a Danish Crown employee being injured at work in any given year.

Jens Hansen, Danish Crown’s communications chief, told DR that the reason for the high ranking was partly industry-related, but also because the company registers each and every incident, irrespective of its severity.

“Most of our employees are equipped with a knife, and even though we have a very large arsenal of safety equipment, we must recognise that cutting injuries are one of the things that adds up in statistics like these,” he said.

“It’s extremely expensive in insurance and sickness benefits when some of our employees get injured. Therefore Danish Crown has just as much interest in reducing the number of work-related injuries as our employees have.”

Hilton Foods Danmark had the highest rate of injuries, the wind turbine producer LM Wind Power came second, and the cleaning company Kongsvang Rengøringsservice had the third-highest rate of workplace injuries.

Aviator Airport Services, SB Pork, Persolit Entreprenørfirma, Scandlines, Tekniclean, and Haribo Lakrids made up the rest of the top ten.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”