304

Opinion

This Week’s Editorial: From emotion to business
Ejvind Sandal

January 15th, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

The reality of the narrative towards refugees cannot be ignored

Ejvind Sandal offers his take on the situation. (photo: MPD01605)

The Danish media and political establishment are pursuing a very unsympathetic narrative regarding the refugees – those already here and the additional 25,000 expected in 2016. Nobody likes a lot of refugees, but the reality cannot be ignored, and Denmark needs to decide whether this is a challenge to embrace or a burden to carry.

The forgotten
Recent coverage has now moved on from rhetoric about humanitarian and social solidarity to concerns about money. Forgotten are the desperate crowds who walked along Danish motorways. Forgotten is the drowned little boy and the pile of stones that used to be somebody’s home.

Now all we hear is municipalities complaining about bearing the cost and asking for government assistance. We have a majority of Venstre mayors around the country, by the way.

Every krone spent 

A total of 9 billion kroner is the price tag for 2016. It is a lot of money. But that is out-of-pocket and not the real cost – simply because every kroner spent will be spent in Denmark. For starters, moms (VAT) of 25 percent will be charged and that the money will eventually make its way back to the Finance Ministry.

Much of the spending will be spent on infrastructure – tents, clothing, food, heat – which somebody (probably in Denmark) will be supplying in exchange for money and then consuming or paying back as taxes.

Not lost but won
The calculation for the additional services needed, which has been released by the municipality organisation Kommunernes Landsforening, is impressive. It estimates the number of refugees arriving in the country will create the need for an estimated 80 new daycare centres and 1,200 new educators.

Additionally, KL has calculated there will be a need for 21 full-time doctors, 21 dentists and 42 dental assistants. Special remedial classes for children and housing will also have to be addressed.

But if the people needed to fill these roles are recruited locally, they will pay taxes and some will come off unemployment benefits.

And then there are the refugees themselves. Some are probably better qualified, and with a more relevant background. In that case, the money is not lost but won.

Growth on the horizon
It is also obvious that most of the care will take place in Denmark where locals have been complaining about marginalisation. Now they will get action and funding at a pace that will outrun even the fastest moving government office relocation.

And public spending of this sort is even calculated into the official BNP summation. So on paper it appears that there will actually be growth.

Bearing in mind that public spending exceeds 1,500,000,000,000 kroner per year, it is pathetic to hear the unholy alliance of the press and politicians banging on about the economic strain. We are, after all, only talking about 9 billion kroner – maybe only half of that after the taxman comes calling.

Hope amongst the people
The good news is that more and more Danes are joining Venligtboerne, a NGO of good people who are welcoming refugees, helping them out and making them feel safe.

Hopefully they will show the world that we are a civilised nation after all – and not one that’s regressing to medieval standards after a few scratches on the surface by the dark forces amongst our media and politicians.

 

About

Ejvind Sandal

Copenhagen Post editor-in-chief Ejvind Sandal has never been afraid to voice his opinion. In 1997 he was fired after a ten-year stint as the chief executive of Politiken for daring to suggest the newspaper merged with Jyllands-Posten. He then joined the J-P board in 2001, finally departing in 2003, the very year it merged with Politiken. He is also a former chairman of the football club Brøndby IF (2000-05) where he memorably refused to give Michael Laudrup a new contract prior to his hasty departure. A practising lawyer until 2014, Sandal is also the former chairman of Vestas Wind Systems and Axcel Industriinvestor. He has been the owner of the Copenhagen Post since 2000.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”