206

News

Facebook censors Little Mermaid photo for nakedness and sexual suggestiveness

TheCopenhagenPost
January 3rd, 2016


This article is more than 8 years old.

Politician couldn’t share her own blog post because it featured the image

The Little Mermaid statue shows “too much bare skin or sexual undertones” to be shown on Facebook, Mette Gjerskov, a Socialdemokraterne politician, found out when she tried to post to the social network a link to her blog that featured a photo of the famous Danish statue.

Didn’t see that coming
“Didn’t see that coming, that our national treasure is categorised in line with child pornography and that kind of abomination,” Gjerskov wrote on Twitter after receiving the notification from Facebook that her post had been rejected.

According to Facebook, users are not allowed to post “images of people in positions showing or suggesting sex or images of nakedness and cleavage. Not even if it has artistic or educational purposes”.

Gjerskov told Ekstra Bladet that she could see the humour in the incident but suggested that a change from Facebook may be in order.

“I can slap myself on the thigh with laughter at how ridiculously the world works, but if people don’t see it as a big joke they should get in touch with Facebook,” she said.

According to Jyllands-Posten, this is not the first time Facebook censorship has excluded Danish cultural creations thought to be inoffensive within the country’s borders. For example, the painting ‘Kvinde foran et spejl’ (woman in front of a mirror) by the Danish golden age painter CW Eckersberg was rejected when a Danish tourist organisation wanted to use it in marketing material.

Jyllands-Posten was unable to get a comment from Facebook about the Little Mermaid exclusion.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”