73

News

Radikale and Socialdemokraterne criticise environmental ministry over new agricultural package

Shifa Rahaman
December 22nd, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Parties to the left of the political spectrum criticised the completion of the new package as a ‘dark day for Denmark’

Political parties in the blue bloc celebrated the completion of the new agricultural package late last night, with environmental and food minister Eva Kjer Hansen writing on Facebook that the package will ensure agricultural growth, more jobs and a better environment.

However, things are not looking quite so rosy to those parties that lie to the left of the political spectrum.

Not good enough
Last night, both Radikale and Socialdemokraterne chose to leave the talks, citing concerns that the present agreement doesn’t have enough safeguards in place to protect the environment.

The agreement does not protect our aquatic environment well enough. It results in additional nitrogen pollution in the coming years, and exposes our groundwater to a risk we cannot live with,” Ida Auken, from Radikale, told Ekstra Bladet.

She was particularly critical of the fact that the current package gives farmers the right to use more nitrogen than they do today and that CO2 emissions from agriculture may increase.

“She [Hansen] would rather not make the agreement CO2 neutral. If there are two million pigs more, then Denmark’s climate-load rises, and it’s exactly what we don’t need right now. She has also acknowledged that there will be 2-3000 tons of extra nitrogen generated,” Auken said.

However, she was careful to stress that Radikale was committed to making an effective agricultural package – but that any package would have to strike a balance between growth and the environment.

A black day for Denmark
Simon Kollerup, from Socialdemokraterne, echoed Auken’s statements.

We left the negotiations because there is a necessary balance between economic growth and more fertilizer in agriculture on the one hand, and nature, environment and climate on the other hand. It is a black day for Denmark when this agriculture and fertilizer policy is being implemented without the necessary environmental protections,” he told Ekstra Bladet.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”