258

News

Danish ducks are halal-slaughtered

Lucie Rychla
December 18th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Dansk Folkeparti worries Islamic rules are taking up too much space in Danish society

Roast duck is a popular meal on the Danish Christmas table (photo: Pixabay)

If you are buying a Danish duck from a supermarket this Christmas, chances are it was slaughtered the halal way, reports Jyllands-Posten.

Dansk And, the only industrial duck slaughterhouse in Denmark, uses this religious method to minimise the animals’ suffering and to appeal to the Muslim population in the country.

Until recently Denmark did not have an industrial duck slaughterhouse, and all the Danish ducks had to be transported and slaughtered either in Poland, Germany or the Netherlands.

Already done with chicken
In October this year, however, Dansk And opened a renovated slaughterhouse in Struer Harbour in central Jutland and expects to process between 800,000 to 900,000 ducks annually, which corresponds to 20-25 percent of the total sales of duck in Denmark.

According to Martin Daasbjerg, the company’s CEO, Danish chicken producers have been slaughtering chicken the halal way for years and he believes butchering the ducks this way is best too.

Supervised by imam
The ducks are run through a stream of water before their throats are cut and they bleed out.

The work is carried out by Muslim employees and supervised by an imam.

Dansk And is thus taking into consideration the needs of the 250,000 Muslims living in Denmark, who are also potential customers.

Chance to choose
However, Martin Henriksen, the integration spokesperson for Dansk Folkeparti, argues the company should give Danish customers the chance to choose if they want a halal-slaughtered duck or not and show as much respect for Danish traditions as they show for the Muslim ones.

While there is no difference in the taste, Henriksen fears Islamic rules are taking up more and more space in Danish society.

Although all the ducks from Dansk And are halal-labelled, consumers can still get a non-halal slaughtered duck for their Christmas table if they shop directly from a duck farmer or if they buy an imported frozen duck in a supermarket.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”