158

News

Relocation of government jobs could be much more expensive than planned

TheCopenhagenPost
December 14th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

One agency has calculated it will cost hundreds of million to move a tenth of the total jobs

Berlingske reports that the government’s planned relocation of government agencies out of Copenhagen could prove to be a more expensive undertaking than was originally thought.

The government originally set aside 400 million kroner for the relocation of 3,900 jobs. However, if the costs involved in relocating the environment and food agency, NaturErhvervstyrelsen, are anything to go by, the total expenses are going to be a lot bigger.

It has been calculated that moving the agency’s 392 jobs from the capital to southern Jutland will cost 184 million kroner between 2016 to 2019 and then a further 30 million kroner per year from 2019 for as long as the organisation maintains two premises during the transition.

What’s more, only 15 percent of NaturErhvervstyrelsen’s employees are expected to follow their jobs, which will incur even more costs.

Minister: it’s worth it
Eva Kjer Hansen, the environment and food minister, said the figures were still very preliminary, but that the goal of redistributing government jobs was worth the price tag.

“We’re talking about a lot of jobs, and therefore the numbers will be relatively high. I’m quite aware that it’s not free to move government jobs out. There are economic expenses. But it is a political priority, as we want it to be,” she said.

“I think it is completely worth it. For me it’s about ensuring public sector jobs across the whole country.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”