106

News

Immigration lawyer: Government and DF are ‘sneaking in’ stricter permanent residence rules

TheCopenhagenPost
December 14th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

The law, expected to be passed in January, would be applied retroactively

The government’s plans to tighten asylum laws have been occupying headlines in recent weeks, but according to Aage Kramp, an immigration lawyer at Advokaterne IMLAW (imlaw.dk), their proposal, which is backed by Dansk Folkeparti (DF), will also affect immigrants waiting to apply for permanent residence in Denmark.

READ MORE: New asylum austerity measures would violate human rights

Tougher requirements
The law is expected to be passed on January 16 and Kramp outlines the number of ways in which the bill will make life more difficult for foreigners hoping to live and integrate in Denmark.

“Basically the rules will increase from five years to require six years of non-stop residence in Denmark, and it will no longer be possible to include short study or work periods outside Denmark,” he said.

“The future language requirement will be up from PD1 to minimum PD2 (Prøve i Dansk 2). Not even university students with subjects on the so-called positive list will qualify for permanent residence. Only those working will qualify. The minimum working requirement will be two and a half years full-time work within the last three years at the time of application.”

What’s more, applicants must satisfy at least two of four supplementary requirements: a high level of Danish, more years of full-time work, minimum earnings in the past two years, and passing a residence test or doing voluntary work.

Kramp highlights that the plans serve the opposite effect to attracting foreign labour.

“Without any public debate about the importance of attracting and retaining highly-educated foreign labour in Denmark in the light of fierce global competition, the law completely removes the possibility to use higher education in Denmark as part of the criteria to qualify for permanent residence – not even within the areas in which Denmark especially needs and want to attract foreign labour,” he said.

Retroactive effect
Finally, Kramp is critical that the proposal will affect the changes retroactively.

“The new law is intended to come into effect already from last Thursday December 10, which will affect many thousands of applicants aiming to pass the the PD1 language exam to obtain permanent residence,” he said.

“It is a surprise that the law is intended to be passed retroactively as that is generally considered against democratic principles.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”