188

News

Maersk disappointed with historic COP21 climate deal

TheCopenhagenPost
December 13th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Climate change agreement does not include regulation of the shipping industry

There was jubilation yesterday evening in the plenary session of COP21 in Paris when 195 countries adopted what has been hailed a landmark climate change agreement. But the Danish shipping giant Maersk is disappointed that regulation of the shipping industry was left out of the deal, Børsen reports.

The COP21 agreement, which is partly legally binding and partly voluntary, commits all countries to reduce carbon emissions and to keep global temperature increases below 2 degrees celcius.

No shipping climate goals
John Kornerup Bang, the chief climate advisor at Maersk, explained that the company had hoped that the agreement would also include global requirements of the shipping industry, but that this was omitted from the final agreement.

“We are disappointed that it didn’t end up in the final agreement,” he said.

“For a long time we have pushed for global regulation, but this has unfortunately not happened.”

Maersk argues that international regulation is inevitable and that a lack thereof simply encourages shipping lines to sail under the flags of countries with the least stringent rules.

Kornerup draws attention to Maersk Line’s investment in more energy-efficient vessels and states that international environmental regulation would give the company a competitive advantage.

“It would definitely be an advantage for us. We believe that it is important that those that are green and effective be rewarded. That’s the only way to make them bigger,” he said.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”