445

Business & Education

The innkeeper and his brood, whose resistance empowered Denmark

TheCopenhagenPost
December 2nd, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Not everyone surrendered quietly to the Nazis during Denmark’s Occupation of the 1940s. The Fiil family of Jutland made the ultimate sacrifice

The Hvidsten Group story was made into a biofilm (photo: Hvidsten Gruppen)

The story of the Hvidsten Group hit movie screens across Denmark in March 2012, but for the villagers of Hvidsten, a hamlet in northern Jutland between Randers and Mariager, the plot was a familiar slice of local history.

As has become clear in so many different recollections, the two world wars of the 20th century transformed quite ordinary people into brave fighters capable of great and heroic acts. Thus, out of a belief in his country, an ordinary innkeeper and his family were recruited by local resistance fighters to help in the dissemination of ammunitions supplies around the Randers area in March 1943.

A different kind of pub brawler
The covert operation included not only publican Marius Fiil, his three children – Niels, Kirstine (‘Tulle’) and Gerda – and son-in-law Peder, but also a handful of local workers.

It was dubbed the Hvidsten Group because the centre of operations was Fiil’s village pub Hvidsten Kro. The historic coaching inn has remained in the family and is run today by Søren Fiil, the great-grandson of Marius and Gudrun Fiil.

Mustard Point
For 15 months, the group received supply drops from British planes and hid them at Hvidsten Kro before it all ended dramatically in June 1944.

Every day around teatime the group would gather around the radio in the pub to listen to BBC broadcasts from England. Upon hearing the code words “Listen again” they knew where they had to be at midnight: a rather bleak spot of marshland within walking distance from the inn that the British RAF called ‘Mustard Point’, which was used both for the supply drop and for hiding the empty containers afterwards.

When they heard the Halifax bombers in the area, four lamps were lit: three white and one red. These lamps allowed the pilots to estimate the direction of the wind, thus helping to determine where to make the drop in the dark.

The containers of ammo and explosives were distributed to a variety of resistance groups across Jutland, where they were used to blow up railway tracks, train yards, bridges and other key locations under German control.

A bitter end
It was a British parachute jumper that eventually gave the group up to the Nazis. After being captured and tortured by the Gestapo in December 1943, he spilled everything, and at 6.15am on 11 March 1944, Hvidsten Kro was surrounded by Nazi troops, who arrested the entire group. After a military tribunal, eight members were executed by firing squad on 29 June that year, including innkeeper Marius Fiil, his son Niels, and son-in-law Peder.

The innkeeper’s two daughters, Kirstine (Tulle) and Gerda, were also arrested, and although Kirstine escaped the fate of her husband, brother and father, both sisters were sentenced to life imprisonment in a German prison.

National outrage
When news of the executions spread across Denmark, public outrage was great, and a wave of smaller strikes in Copenhagen developed into a co-ordinated, nationwide general strike.

Kirstine Fiil was released from prison at the end of the second World War and remarried a concentration camp survivor named Olaf Møller, who was in the military. She returned to Hvidsten Kro and – bar a few short relocations due to her husband’s army postings – remained there until her death in 1983.

Memorials still stand
One family member who may only have a passing role in the film, but – at least according to one reviewer from DR – is perhaps the most interesting, is Gerda Fiil. The youngest of the Fiil children was just 16 when the supply drops began and was told by her parents to “stay at home”. Resistance comes naturally to teenagers, however, and Gerda’s role was an active one that led to her arrest aged just 17.

READ MORE: Nobel cause: how Niels Bohr and his accomplice fooled the Nazis on Occupation Day

The entire area around Randers and Mariager contains many reminders of the contribution the group made to the Danish Resistance, including a number of plaques and stone memorials. Interested visitors can find walks and guided tours not only around Hvidsten Kro, but also to the drop site, Mustard Point.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”