340

News

Aarhus bans birch trees in public places

Christian Wenande
November 16th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Efforts aims to reduce the pollen concentration in the city by 10-30 percent

Most people in Denmark quiver in anticipation of the arrival of spring. The blossoming flowers and trees herald an escape from what is usually a long and gloomy winter.

But for many others, springtime also means suffering. As pollen concentrations soar, sneezing fits, runny noses and itchy eyes reduce the quality of life dramatically for hay fever sufferers. Now the city of Aarhus is taking a stand. No more birch trees!

Aarhus Municipality has decided to ban the future planting of birch trees in public places. The birch tree is one of the pollen sources that harasses allergy sufferers the most during spring and early summer.

“By avoiding planting birch trees in the forests, along the roads and in parks, we can reduce the pollen concentrations a few percent so as to help those allergic to pollen in the city,” Peter Søgaard, a biologist with Aarhus Municipality, told DR Nyheder.

READ MORE: New study: Urban upbringing escalates allergy risk

Can’t stop it all
Søgaard said that he expects the effort will reduce the pollen concentration in the city by 10-30 percent.

But the city won’t be able to completely rid itself of pollen because there are plenty of birch trees on private grounds and much of the pollen is carried by the wind from massive birch forests in Poland and Sweden.

“When the wind is right [or wrong] massive clouds of birch pollen are brought over to us in the air,” said Søgaard. “Birch is a very light pollen and it can travel hundreds of kilometres.”

Aarhus will also try to reduce the amount of grass pollen in the city by cutting the grass in public parks before the grass has a chance to bloom and release pollen.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”