171

News

Prince Henrik still miffed he is not a king

Lucie Rychla
October 20th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Now in his ninth decade, the husband of Queen Margrethe II has told a French newspaper he is being discriminated against

Henrik, the prince consort of Denmark (photo: Holger Motzkau)

Prince Henrik, the husband of Queen Margrethe II, has complained to the French newspaper Le Figaro that he is being discriminated against in Denmark because he cannot officially use the title of king, reports Metroxpress.

According to Danish law, the husband of a queen in Denmark can only be called a prince or ‘His Highness’, while the wife of a male monarch is automatically a queen.

Feeling angry
“I even decided to call myself ‘Prince Consort’ to find a place in Danish society as well as for my purpose and position in my work as a prince,” Prince Henrik told Le Figaro.

“It makes me angry that I am being discriminated against.”

“Denmark, which is otherwise known to be an avid defender of gender equality, is apparently willing to treat husbands as less worthy than wives.”

Politicians might help
Prince Henrik’s dissatisfaction with his current title is well known and has been a matter of political debate.

Prior to the general election, most politicians said they were not opposed to Prince Henrik having the title of king.

READ MORE: Political majority willing to give Prince Henrik the title of king

Reflecting on life in France
The 81-year-old prince married the Danish queen on 10 June 1967 and together they have two sons: Crown Prince Frederik and Prince Joachim.

In 2002, Prince Consort Henrik fled Denmark to reflect on his life at his chateau in Caix in southern France.

He claimed his status in the Danish Royal Family had been downgraded, but after three weeks he returned and resumed his royal duties.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”