87

News

Danish government retracts grant for suicide helpline’s night opening

TheCopenhagenPost
October 4th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Organisation says it cannot go on with after-hours service without the grant

With its finance bill for 2016, the government aims to cancel four million kroner of support pledged to the suicide helpline Livslinien, forcing it to end its night-time opening, Politiken reports.

Chairman: will cost lives
Morten Thomsen, the chairman of Livslinien’s board, said that he fears the consequences of the service being unable to take the 5,000 calls it annually receives in the late hours.

“During the night anxiety, drugs and alcohol often cumulate and put people at risk of suicide in a particularly fragile situation,” he said.

“If they can’t call us it’s going to cost human lives.”

Livslinien has operated during the night since 2014 and the 2015 budget granted the organisation four million kroner in order to continue the service from 2016 to 2018 if it’s effects were evaluated to be satisfactory.

Reported effectiveness
The accountancy and consultancy firm Deloitte carried out an evaluation from May 2015. Its report concluded that night-time opening was indeed effective.

“Overall the evaluation shows that the extended opening time means that Livslinien to a greater degree is able to help Danes at risk of suicide since more guidance conversations are carried out than before the extended opening hours and since the conversations satisfy a special need among the users for guidance during the night, where other suicide prevention services are closed,” the report stated.

However, the present government has now retracted the extra funds from the organisation.

Minister: look elsewhere
Sophie Løhde, the health minister, highlights that Livslinien will continue to receive its 6 million kroner of funding for next year’s operations and encourages the charity to seek funds elsewhere for its night opening.

“Previously Livslinien has been good at getting support from private funds and it can’t be ruled out that in the future funding can be obtained from funds and others to support Livslinien’s work,” she said.

But Jeppe Kristen Toft, Livslinien’s CEO, dismisses this argument.

“The money we got was to set up the night-time opening. Not to run it,” he said.

“If there were funds we could go after for running the night telephones we would do so. But we have not found any, and without the grant we will therefore be forced to close the telephones.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”