261

Education

CBS forced to cut students places

Lucie Rychla
September 27th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Copenhagen Business School (CBS) has been hit hard by the government’s recently announced austerity requirements that ask universities and colleges to save 2 percent annually on expenses.

As a consequence, CBS will be forced to cut 2,700 student places by 2019 and reduce the intake of new students by 15 percent.

Master’s blow
In the future, CBS will accept fewer master’s degree students as educating them costs more than educating bachelor students.

“They [the students] will have to study somewhere else, but their chance of getting a job afterwards will be lower,” Per Holten-Andersen, the president of CBS, told Berlingske.

Reputation at risk
According to Holten-Andersen, CBS graduates are currently more likely to get a job and higher wages than others, but that could change.

“It will not be the same at CBS. We have built up an extremely great reputation abroad, but we now risk losing it,” Holten-Andersen noted.

Already hit hard
According to the president, CBS gets less state funding per student than other Danish universities and earns more from its education programs than research.

Moreover, the university has just recently implemented another savings plan of 60 million kroner that will start in 2017.

Among world’s best
Meanwhile, the CBS course ‘Business and Management’ placed among the world’s top ten, according to the latest QS World University Rankings.

“We are obviously delighted about the results, especially as all the other universities have a three-to-ten-times higher budget per student,” Sven Bislev, the vice dean of education at CBS, told Finans.

Despite low budget
CBS spends about 55,000 kroner per student annually, while many of the foreign universities spend up to 300,000 kroner, according to Bislev.

Another of its courses, ‘Accounting and Finance’, also ranked highly in the international comparison, taking a place among the top 50.

The annual QS World University Rankings cover more than 800 of the top universities in the world and bases its results on six key performance indicators, including academic reputation and research publications.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”