196

News

Danish pig producers reducing the use of antibiotics

Lucie Rychla
September 24th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

The use of tetracycline for pigs may increase resistance to the antibiotic also among people

New figures from Fødevarestyrelsen, the food authority, reveal that Danish pig producers reduced the use of the antibiotic tetracycline by 9.1 percent in the first half of 2015 compared to the same period last year.

Compared to other countries, Denmark and the Netherlands are world pioneers when it comes to having a large, intensive pig production with a low consumption of antibiotics.

It’s your choice
“It took us a long time to get here. Over the years, we have developed new housing systems, improved hygiene and generally the way we produce pigs,” stated Claus Fertin, the head of the Danish Pig Research Centre (PRC).

“You may save a few kroner on buying bacon that was not produced in Denmark, but as a consumer you should be aware that every time you choose a meat product that is not Danish, you accept it contains a much higher level of antibiotics.”

READ MORE: Reduction of antibiotic use and more welfare inspections for Danish pigs

May increase resistance
The intention to decrease the use of tetracycline, which is used to treat many different bacterial infections, comes after medical professionals found it may increase resistance to the antibiotic also among humans.

Last year, the PRC announced a plan to halve the use of tetracycline by the end of 2015; however, the goal will probably not be reached as pig producers have only managed to reduce the usage by 20.5 percent so far.

Looking for an alternative
According to Kristian Viekilde, the pig veterinarian chairman at the Danish Veterinary Association, the two organisations are also focusing on finding an alternative to tetracycline that would not compromise animal welfare.

The PRC is currently conducting a study among 20 pig producers who do not use tetracycline at all.

The research centre hopes results will show when the use of antibiotics is necessary and when it can be avoided.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”