113

News

Archaeological breakthrough can unravel the mystery of Viking trips to Greenland

Lucie Rychla
September 22nd, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

A group of Danish scientists have developed a new tool that could provide the answers

Danish scientists have developed a new method that can help determine whether Vikings settled on Greenland to trade walrus tusks in the 10th century, reports magazine Videnskab.

For years, archeologists have been wondering whether the trade of walrus tusks was so attractive it would make Vikings travel thousands of kilometres across the Atlantic and settle down in Greenland, far away from everything.

Concrete archaeological finds or written documents simply do not exist, and until now scientists have lacked a reliable method that would help them determine the origins of walrus artefacts found in Viking settlements.

It feels ‘huge’
“For the first time ever, we have got a promising tracking system. It feels huge and somehow a little unrealistic, ” Karin Margarita Frei – a senior scientist at the National Museum of Denmark, who has helped develop the new method – told Videnskab.

Frei, a world-known scientist, has developed a method that can track where a person lived and travelled during different periods of their life by using the chemical element strontium.

However, the levels of strontium are the same in all the world’s oceans and therefore this method cannot be used on walruses.

Tracking levels of lead
Thus, when a group of Canadian researchers found differences between modern walruses could be determined by checking for the chemical lead, Frei and her husband Robert, a bio-archaeologist and researcher at Aarhus University, started to investigate whether the same could be done in the case of walrus tusks from the 10th century.

Based on previous archaeological findings, scientists have concluded the trade in walrus tusks was very important for ‘Greenland Vikings’, known as the Norse, and they know with certainty the trade existed between Greenland and northern Europe in the 12th and 13th centuries.

With the new tool, archaeologists will be for the first time able to get a clear answer to whether this is also true for the 10th century or not.

The development of the new method is still at an early stage, and museums are reluctant to lend their walrus artefacts for testing as the scientists cannot promise to return them undamaged.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”