139

News

Mærsk makes major purchase in Latin America

TheCopenhagenPost
September 8th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

A.P. Møller-Mærsk’s port division, APM Terminals, has taken over Grup Maritim TCB and its 11 port terminals

Maersk has made a major purchase (photo: Garitzko )

AP Møller-Maersk has purchased Grup Maritim, the world’s 23rd largest port operator, which has 11 ports in Spain, Turkey and Latin America. The deal is worth several billion kroner and most of the ports are in Spanish-speaking countries. Once approved, the Danish company’s terminal division will have 74 ports in 40 countries.

Grup Maritim was founded in 1972 and has been the private property of the Perez-Maura family. Last year, the company handled about 2 million containers. By comparison, APM Terminals handled 38 million containers.

“Robust financial performance and balance put APM Terminals in a strong position to make an investment of this type in a volatile market and pursue growth opportunities – both organic and through acquisitions,” said chief executive, Nils S Andersen.

Major capacity increase
The 11 new ports add a capacity of 4.3 million containers and an annual volume of 3.5 million containers.

“This acquisition supports our growth plans,” said Andersen.

Latin America has been a strategic focus of AP Møller-Mærsk for a while. The company has made several other investments, including a major joint venture in Colombia.

Stig Frederiksen, an analyst at Nordea, said the acquisition was a solid one for AP Møller-Mærsk.

“It gives them access to attractive areas,” Frederiksen told Berlingske. “Spain is an area that has come back from the economic crisis relatively quickly, and the Latin American market should continue to grow in the long term.”

A good fit
AP Møller-Mærsk would not disclose the price of the deal, but the group has a stated goal that all investments must generate a return of 10 percent.

Kim Fejfer, the administrative head of APM Terminals, said the Spanish company is a good fit for AP Møller-Mærsk.

“It is one of the best-run companies in the market,” said Fejfer. “The company has a reputation for good service and a professional staff.”

READ MORE: Maersk Group posts record profits

The company expects to complete the deal by the end of the year. It must first be approved by several authorities.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”