156

Opinion

Trading Kingdoms: Investor protection against state regulation

August 9th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Can the TTIP cure the EU’s economic pain? (photo: archives)

Europe is still recovering from the financial crisis and the TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership) is supposed to be the panacea for its economic pain. Despite everyone agreeing that it will provide the necessary growth, the process has been blocked by the gridlock on investment protection and the Investors-to-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS).

Expanding trade
EU combined outward and inward FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) stocks stand at nearly 9 trillion euros. That is over half the value of global merchandise trade in 2013. As an economic block, FDI is very important for expanding our trade links and expanding the global value chain. The US is our largest single trading partner and recipient of our FDI; consequently agreeing on a way forward on ISDS is very important in securing a FTA (Free Trade Agreement) with them.
Shared vision

GEs investments in Europe (analysed in detail in the paper) are just one example of US companies’ continuous commitment to fostering economic partnerships with the EU. The flow goes the other way as well. EU member states’ combined investment in the US tops 1.6 trillion euros across multiple sectors, from healthcare to energy. This clearly illustrates the shared vision for growth from both sides of the Atlantic.

The right balance
While we acknowledge that investing in some of these sectors bears high risk for those doing so, we must not forget that profits must not come at the unreasonable expense of the public. It’s something that Corporate Europe Observatory fears – that ISDS will place EU states in a challenging predicament from day one with a “chilling effect”.

This conclusion is challenged by the Danish Institute of Human Rights, which believes that the protection of investors and businesses is just as important as protecting the welfare of citizens. Their conclusion here is: how do we create that balance?

Strengthened alliance
As the US ambassador to Denmark stated at our April conference: “It requires a careful approach to investment protection and, in the process, the economic alliance between the EU and the US will be strengthened.”

As an independent body, the British Chamber is delighted to facilitate this type of thought-provoking debate.

About


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”