87

News

Small islands should be shut down and sold, says researcher

TheCopenhagenPost
August 6th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Too expensive for local authorities to keep them going

Denmark is dotted with tiny islands that cost a lot to maintain (photo: JialiangGao)

Small Danish islands should be shut down and sold to wealthy foreign or Danish business people or foundations that could convert them into enterprises like hunting reserves, spas, retirement villages, convention centres or even casino islands.

Jørgen Møller – an associate professor and researcher at Aalborg University specialising in local planning, villages and communities – said it was “nonsense” to keep alive the smallest islands, where a handful of residents need to be serviced by ferries, schools and other municipal services.

“We need an unbiased debate about what we should use the islands for – especially those with only 15, 20 or 25 residents,” Møller told Politiken. “It is simply too expensive for local authorities and communities to keep them alive.”

Foreign money
Møller said it simply “made more sense” to have professional investors buy and operate the islands as holiday resorts and natural parks.

“It could be some of the rich Russians who buy football clubs in England, or Germans with a penchant for Danish sea and nature,” said Møller.

The number of residents on smaller Danish islands has been falling for over a decade. Just 5,590 residents occupy the smaller islands, according to Danmarks Statistik.

Where the wild things could be
“We can see that municipalities are paying high costs for small islands where the population is shrinking,” said Hans Thor Andersen, the head of building research group Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut.

“The island issue is the extreme version of what is happening on the periphery of all of Denmark because the islands are so isolated from the outside world.”

READ MORE: Buy your own Danish island

Andersen said that many of the islands could be converted into nature preserves.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”