81

News

Smaller municipalities missing out on welfare funds for the vulnerable

Christian Wenande
July 6th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

The country’s largest and most resourceful municipalities have a leg up

Not all of Denmark’s 98 municipalities reap the rewards from the slush fund for the socially vulnerable, according to DR.

An investigation by national broadcaster found that it’s mostly the country’s largest and resourceful municipalities that benefited from the 111 million kroner handed out from 2011-2013. In fact, many smaller municipalities didn’t get anything at all.

“It takes a lot of time and resources, but also competencies, to even have a chance to apply for funds,” Kurt Houlberg, a researcher with the municipal research institute KORA, told DR Nyheder.

“For a small municipality, it will often be too time-consuming to launch an application given the odds of being awarded the funds.”

The difference between the municipalities become obvious when looking at funds awarded per capita.

Municipalities with populations over 70,000 were awarded over 27 kroner per citizen on average, while municipalities with populations under 30,000 received barely 11 kroner per citizen.

READ MORE: Life expectancy in Danish municipalities varies considerably

15 received nothing
Odense, Aarhus and Aalborg municipalities were given the most in Denmark from 2011-2013, while 15 municipalities – including Glostrup, Rødovre, Ballerup and Frederiksberg – were given nothing.

The social vulnerable funds cover a broad spectrum of projects from better food at nursing homes to the homeless, refugees and socially-vulnerable children and adults.

According to the Social Ministry, it can take several weeks for the municipalities to make an application, and they must subsequently deliver progress reports and auditor-endorsed accounts of how the funds are being spent.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”