214

Opinion

Post Festum

June 26th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

“More Denmark, less EU – it’s possible” (Photo: Flickr)

The election result was a close one, just like it was predicted. First past the pole, the PM lost to a rival who finished way back in third. It does not come any closer.

DF had a headstart
So the blues have it. A month of the television stations reporting on the migrants drowning in the Med scared the electorate, and in the end, no amount of scare-mongering on immigration regulations could ever close the gap on Dansk Folkeparti, which ended up becoming the largest blue party.

DF promises increased public spending, more liberal unemployment benefits and stronger border controls. It agrees that Denmark could exercise its judicial opt-out through a referendum, but as a condition of co-operation and support for other EU nations, the overall authority should rest with Brussels.

Options dwindling
Clearly Lars Løkke Rasmussen has given up any thoughts of forming a majority government with Konservative. With only six mandates at this last election, the true blues will be fearful they’ll completely drown in the blue sea at the next election if they hang onto Venstre’s coat-tails this time around.

Meanwhile, the conflicting issues with Liberal Alliance, which is as liberal as they come and in many ways just as populist as DF, look impossible to reconcile.

Middle ground likely
That leaves Rasmussen alone with his reduced group of parliamentarians. A minority government – yes , but governing not from a position of strength, but from a pragmatic point of view that will involve Rasmussen having to stretch out across the middle ground.

There he will find Mette Frederiksen, the soon to be confirmed leader of Socialdemokraterne who is surely destined to become this country’s second female PM. With no red party contenders to challenge her, she can afford to be responsible, while Rasmussen cannot afford not to be.

What Helle Thorning-Schmidt will do, we cannot say – she deserves a good holiday after a well-performed campaign. Next time the EU needs a foreign minister, we’re puting our money on her.

About


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”