99

News

Multilingual voting instructions debated at City Hall

TheCopenhagenPost
June 23rd, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Deputy mayors disagree about whether to translate general election information

To vote in last week’s election required a Danish passport, but should the democratic process also be reserved for those who can find their way around a Danish dictionary? This is a question dividing two of Copenhagen’s deputy mayors, DR reports.

READ MORE: Experts concerned that foreigners feel excluded during the Danish general election

Anna Mee Allerslev, the Radikale deputy mayor for integration, and Carl Christian Ebbesen of DF, the deputy mayor for culture and leisure, disagree about whether voting instructions in the election should have been available in languages other than Danish.

Allerslev contends there is a clear correlation between the lack of instructions in any other language and the low turnout in areas such as Bispebjerg, where 7 percent fewer voters made it to the polls than the national average.

“Given that we have made such good voting instructions in Danish, I think it’s unfortunate we didn’t take the trouble to translate it into at least English, and also other languages,” she said.

Instruction or integration?
Ebbesen, who was responsible for the election preparations, is of the opposite opinion.

“The people who vote in a general election should be able to speak Danish and pass a Danish test in order to even become a Danish citizen and get the right to vote,” he said.

“So at a general election it makes no sense to give instructions in any language other than Danish. Anything else would be a waste of money.”

Ebbesen has his own explanation for the low turnout in certain areas.

“I must note that the low turnout in some areas might have more to do with lacking integration in these areas than it has to do with information about the election,” he stated.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”