111

News

100 million kroner pledged to untouched Danish forests

Pia Marsh
June 12th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Government follows researchers advice and launches new initiative aimed at putting a stop to timber production in natural forests

“Biodiversity has always been a concern,” says environmental minister (photo: Nick Lott)

In co-operation with researchers, Socialdemokraterne and Radikale have agreed to convert large areas of Danish woodland from timber production sites into natural forest.

Yesterday, they launched a new five-year initiative, allocating 100 million kroner towards the restructuring of the nation’s forests.

“It is a big step forward compared to what we have seen from the government in the past, but it is still far from enough,” Thor Hjarsen, a biologist at the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), told Politiken.

Initiative is an EU requirement
According to researchers, the initiative represents the bare minimum that Denmark can do to improve its biodiversity as required by the EU and the UN, and most tend to agree that natural forest is the cheapest and most efficient way to do so.

The environment minister, Kirsten Brosbøl (S), says her focus is, and has always been, on the best ways to leave the forests untouched.

“We have somewhere in the latitude of 39 billion kroner, which the government has granted us until 2020, to use to prioritise nature and biodiversity. We have always been concerned with getting better biodiversity,” Brosbøl told Politiken.

Venstre jumps on the bandwagon
Venstre’s environmental spokesman, Henrik Hoegh, has assured the public that his party’s promise of untouched forests remains in force.

However, he asserts that all or part of the financing may be obtained by throttling the restoration of agricultural land in order to help biodiversity.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”