108

News

Candidate’s circumcision comments cut deep

TheCopenhagenPost
June 9th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Ida Auken’s comments that circumcision of boys – but not girls – is ok, kicks off a social media storm

Facebook comments by Radikale candidate Ida Auken that she has the “religious and cultural freedom to let her son be circumcised” has kicked up controversy on social media.

The statement was made in a private discussion with the doctor Morten Frisch, who is preparing a summary of parliamentary candidate’s attitudes on the circumcision of boys.

Auken gave Frisch permission to publish the statement on his Facebook profile.

During the debate, Auken said that her support for religious circumcision includes only male children. That stance has led to several challenges on social media.

Comedian Lasse Rimmer asked on Twitter, “Do you think that a girl’s genitals deserve specific protection under the law, while a boy’s do not?”

READ MORE: Danes want circumcision banned

Another commentator, Thomas Finn, asked Auken to make a list of “pieces of skin that it is ok to cut off of healthy boys.”

Auken has yet to respond to any specific questions.

“I am not a spokesperson in the field,” she told Jyllands-Posten. “You should call Radikale’s spokesperson, but I do not think that it is the campaign’s main issue.”

Not ready to make it a law
Liv Holm Andersen, Radikale’s equality spokesman, said that the party had considered a resolution at its 2013 congress that it would work for a ban on circumcision of boys, similar to the law governing the circumcision of minor girls.

The resolution has never been voted on, so Radikale has yet to adopt an official stance on the circumcision of boys.

Andersen said that although Radikale’s parliamentary members are mostly opposed to male circumcision, they are not ready to create legislation making it illegal.

Public support
Frisch’s study of the candidates’ attitudes to male circumcision is not yet finished, but a recent poll showed that 17 of the 21 Radikale parliamentary candidates who responded, supported a total or partial ban on circumcision of boys.

A YouGov poll conducted for Metroxpress last October showed that 74 percent of respondents fully or partially support banning non-medical circumcision. Only 10 percent of respondents were directly opposed to a ban.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”