116

News

Danish architects to design World Trade Center skyscraper number two

Lucie Rychla
June 4th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Bjarke Ingels Group taking over from British architects with a design geared toward creative businesses

Lower Manhatten with the already constructed One and Four World Trade Center (photo: Cadiomals)

Danish architects from the Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) have been chosen to redesign the ‘state-of-the-art tower’ Two World Trade Center – one of five buildings that will ultimately replace the Twin Towers destroyed in 2001 – reports DR.

According to Daria Pahhota, BIG’s spokesperson, the studio was hired to design Two World Trade Center for Silverstein Properties and 21st Century Fox and News Corp.

BIG skyscraper to transform Lower Manhatten
“We are very honored and humbled by the great task to contribute to the reconstruction of the World Trade Center more than a decade after 9/11 and help transform Downtown Manhattan [aka Lower Manhattan] into a vibrant environment for creative businesses and all New Yorkers, ” Pahhota said in a statement.

The district in Lower Manhattan has undergone major changes since the terrorist attack in 2001, and Pahhota emphasised the BIG skyscraper will be an important part of the transformation.

READ MORE: Danish design will make Manhattan prettier and safer

Geared toward creative businesses
The Danish firm is taking over the task of designing Two World Trade Center from the British architects Foster and Partners.

While Foster’s design was targeted at financial companies, BIG’s design will be geared more towards creative businesses with news studios and editing rooms.

Bjarke Ingels Group is getting really big in the US with architectural projects including the Google HQ, the Smithsonian Institute’s campus in Washington DC and an upgrade design for storm defences around Lower Manhattan.

READ MORE: BIG plans unveiled for Smithsonian South Mall campus in US capital

BIG designs all over the world
The company was founded in 2005 by Bjarke Ingels in Copenhagen, and five years later a branch office opened in New York City.

Today, the architecture firm employs around 200 architects working on projects in more than 18 countries.

READ MORE: Danish Maritime Museum wins DETAIL Prize 2014

In Denmark, BIG has designed, among others, the Danish Maritime Museum, the Copenhagen Harbour baths and the 8 House in Ørestad.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”