120

Opinion

Fashion Jam: Consumers need to play their part in sustainable fashion

May 23rd, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

It might be a bit hypocritical for someone in my business to tell people to shop less, but I’m not without a conscience and I realise that something has to be done about the way we consume.

It’s easy to blame the industry, but it really comes down to the Western consumer: you and me.

A rap from WRAP
Here are some key facts according to WRAP (Wellness Recovery Action Plan) about clothes consumption in one such Western country (in this case, the UK) …

The average household owns around 40,000 kroner’s worth of clothes; around 30 percent of the clothing in wardrobes has not been worn for at least a year; the cost of this unused clothing is around 300 billion kroner; extending the average life of clothes by just three months of active use would lead to a 5-10 percent reduction in each of the carbon, water and waste footprints; and an estimated £1.4 billion kroner’s worth (around 350,000 tonnes) of used clothing ends up in the landfill every year.

Given how similar the UK is to Denmark in this area, it’s safe to assume that if you divide those  figures by eleven, you’ll come close to the amount of wastage over here.

Evolving in a smart way
The fashion industry is constantly evolving towards greener practices and products, and most fashion houses today have an organic or recycled line of clothing.

And increasingly, sustainably-minded designers are even shifting their focus away from strictly organic materials (which tend to be basic) in favour of a more holistic approach that takes into account the entire life cycle of a piece of clothing, from its carbon footprint to the livelihood of the workers who made it.

Denmark is one of the most prominent in the race to become a green country when it comes to fashion.  They are bursting forth with ideas and concepts like there’s no tomorrow – clothing exchanges, clothing repairs and even clothing libraries are some of the business concepts that have been recently launched.

Several of the newer Danish companies are green from the moment they start up. One such one is the Danish knitwear company AIAYU, which produces clothes, accessories, cushions and rugs in one material: cashllama. In addition, it actively aims to lengthen the service life of its products, encouraging its customers to send in their favourite clothes for free repair, even if the damage is of their own making.

Environmental and edgy
So is it possible to be on trend and follow fashion without contributing to the
massive wastefulness?

I think it is, and even if fast-fashion isn’t going away anytime soon, perhaps ‘fastuse’ can be more sustainable if we reimagine the business model. We can use garments in a cost-effective and environmentally efficient way without actually owning them. Collaborative consumption, in which people share and crowd-source fashion, may provide a solution.

Online marketplaces for users to swap and share second-hand items without monetary transactions already exist. Shoppers can currently rent high-priced designer fashion from the catwalk thanks to online businesses such as Rent-the- Runway, Style Society and Rent My Rack.

Over two-thirds of the UK population is willing to buy and wear pre-owned clothing, and platforms such as Twice, LKBK and Vestiaire Collective are taking advantage of this growing market. One man’s trash is another man’s treasure!
Put plainly, even if fashion does clean up its act, unless consumers do the same with their wardrobe habits, then we’re still in the same stinking situation.


As a Swede who spent eleven years in London and New York, coming to Denmark three years ago had its ups and downs for Jenny Egsten-Ericson. Having worked in fashion most of her professional life, Jenny will be giving her opinion on our dress sense: the right choices and the bad ones.

 

About


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”