260

News

Danish politicians steering clear of German WWII reparations

Christian Wenande
May 5th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

A stable relationship with Germany more beneficial than reparation claims

The Germans left behind a hefty bill (photo: German Federal Archive)

When the defeated German army left Denmark 70 years ago in May 1945 following the Allies’ liberation of Europe in WWII, it left behind 11.6 billion kroner of debt accumulated during the occupation.

But since then, the Germans have only paid back a fraction of the debt – which taking today’s inflation into account is estimated to be in excess of 200 billion kroner. The issue has zero political will and the reparations will probably never be paid.

“It’s a dead case. No responsible politician will raise the question and say the Germans owe us money,” Steen Andersen, an associate professor of history at Copenhagen Business School, told Jyllands-Posten newspaper.

“The Danish-German relationship is stable and was helped along in particular by the Bonn-Copenhagen agreement in 1955 where an accord was struck concerning each other’s borders and minorities. It would be political idiocy to gamble with that stability.”

READ MORE: “Liberation is on the way – May the 4th be with you”

Gave up in 1977
Joachim Lund, Andersen’s colleague at CBS, concurs. He argues that Germany doesn’t owe Denmark a single kroner, and that Denmark and the rest of Europe have reaped the benefits of Germany’s economic rejuvenation.

At a conference in London in 1953, Denmark and a number of other nations agreed to cut in half Germany’s outstanding debt.

In 1977, the Danish prime minister at the time, Anker Jørgensen, confirmed the government would not try to collect the German debt.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”