104

News

New book casts further doubt on legality of Dong sale to Goldman Sachs

TheCopenhagenPost
April 14th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Newly revealed memo from government’s legal counsel highlights lack of transparency

When the Danish state sold an 18 percent shareholding in the energy company Dong to the American investment bank Goldman Sachs, there was debate about the legality of the deal, and now a new book casts further doubt on the propriety of the transaction, Politiken reports.

READ MORE: Questions linger over DONG and Sachs deal

According to ‘Det bedste bud’ (the best offer) by journalist Anders-Peter Mathiasen, the government’s legal counsel Kammeradvokaten advised the Finance Ministry that the sale should take place under free market conditions and without an agreed governmental strategy.

“A deal should be open and transparent,” Kammeradvokaten is said to have written in a memo on EU rules on 3 February 2013, adding that the sale should be advertised “in such good time that potential investors would have time to become involved.”

Not publicly announced
Mathiasen accuses the government of failing to do this. The deal was publicised in the Financial Times and the Wall Street Journal just 16 days ahead of the deadline for bids and there was no announcement in the Danish media.

This is said to have elicited the conclusion from Kammeradvokaten in a memo of 26 January 2014 that “the process has – as a structured bidding process – not been publicly announced”.

Frank Aaen, Enhedslisten’s finance spokesperson, told Politiken that the revelation of Kammeradvokaten’s assessment of the process is evidence of a breach of EU rules.

However, the Finance Ministry rejects this assumption, claiming that the ‘structured bidding process’ doesn’t require publicity as long as the general competition rules are adhered to.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”