241

Opinion

Trading kingdoms: TTIP investor challenges

April 12th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

TTIP Investor challenges
Investment is a vital part of the EU’s economy: it is an essential basis for creating and maintaining businesses and jobs in the wake of the financial crisis. TTIP will further promote investment between the US and EU that currently stands at over 2 trillion euros.

Occasionally, things can go wrong under a free trade agreement, and ISDS (Investor State Dispute Settlement) provides the mechanism for disputes to be solved. The ISDS clause in TTIP should do just that.

Assurance of fair treatment
In the EU, investments often come from abroad and the US plays a major role, accounting for 58 percent of foreign investment capital between 2011 and 2013. To maintain a steady inflow of capital and attract even more with TTIP, investors need assurances of fair treatment in the EU.

Furthermore, the level of protection foreign companies receive in the EU sets a precedent for how the EU’s companies will be treated when they invest in the US. EU countries’ combined investments in the US are approximately 1.6 trillion euros, making the EU the biggest investor in the US.

Investors are not only industrial or service companies; they are also pension funds looking for ways to live up to your retirement commitment or the investment arm of the local bank holding your deposits.

So the interest in ensuring that investments abroad receive the best possible protection extends beyond businesses to individuals.

Need for clarification
The outcome of the EU Public Consultation Report on Investment Protection/ISDS in TTIP highlights that the rules need to be further clarified to assist accurate understanding by the public and business stakeholders.

In Denmark, for example, the trade unions are concerned about the risk of lowering labour standards in favour of investment. Others call for increasing the level of transparency around the dispute settlement mechanism and preventing its abuse by companies. Some even feel there is no need for the ISDS mechanism in the treaty at all. They would argue that it should be scrapped and replaced by commercial political risk insurance.


Mariano A DaviesMariano A Davies is the president & CEO of both the language learning provider Oxford Institute (oxfordinstitute.biz) and the British Chamber of Commerce in Denmark (bccd.dk). BCCD, the Danish arm of a global network of British chambers, provides networking and facilitation through events and other professional services for the business community in Denmark.

About


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”