228

Opinion

Never again an April 9

April 10th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

NOW, 75 YEARS after the German invasion on 9 April 1940, we are in no doubt when it comes to what, when, why and who. A new movie has shown the heroic but rather hopeless resistance that was put up in southern Jutland. The German Wehrmacht arrived with 125,000 soldiers, 1,000 airplanes and its Baltic fleet.  There was not a lot we could have done, even with better preparations. We were alone and weak.

Stuck in neutral
DENMARK was at the time neutral. As the controlling power over the sailing routes to the Baltic Sea, Denmark could not afford an alliance with Britain or Germany. And it would not be allowed one. However, a non-aggression pact with Germany was implemented. The Germans then said sorry, but we need the iron ore from Sweden to be shipped out from Narvik in Norway and we have to control the sailing route.  Thus we have to occupy Denmark and Norway to prevent the British from doing so.

Strategic Sweden
THROUGH the whole of World War II, millions of tonnes of supplies were shipped to Germany and were essential for the German war machine. Sweden allowed that – not that reluctantly – as the price they had to pay to stay out of the war.
Which was just as well, as Sweden became a much appreciated refuge for Danish and Norwegian resistance members on the run – not to mention the 7,000 Danish Jews who were smuggled across to safety. Less than 500 were rounded up
and deported to German concentration camps where luckily many survived. But it was all about steel.

No more Mr Nice Guy
THAT WAS the end of Danish neutrality. Being a frontline state against the Soviet bloc, we knew we might once again be occupied to open the waters for the Soviet Baltic Fleet, but this time we would not let it happen without a  fight and we did not want to  fight. We joined NATO in 1948 after the Nordic defence plan failed. It is still debated if NATO could really have prevented an invasion, but eventually the balance of power and the nuclear shield succeeded. There was just a nagging doubt if we were really worth a nuclear strike from our allies if a surprise attack from the east was launched. But that would to some extent depend on ourselves.

Learning the lessons
WE SAW then and now that neutrality does not make sense. Global hostility of all sorts can only be met with a co-ordinated effort from all democratic
countries.
We have seen how terrorism and crime are internationalised and not playing by any rules. Where would we be if we had not learned the lesson from 9 April 1940?

About


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”