111

News

Sports venture sounds like a matter of the heart, say experts

TheCopenhagenPost
April 10th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Investment company’s plans attracting scepticism

Investment analysts are sceptical about the investability of a new sports venture being formed by the capital investment company Hellerup Finans (HF).

HF, which holds a controlling stake in Danish First Division football team Lyngby Boldklub, recently made a major acquisition in the handball club Viborg HK, and it plans to acquire similar stakes in ice hockey, basketball and cycling teams and to use them as a marketing tool to generate business.

The heart not the head
Per Hansen, as investment economist at the investment management company Nordnet, was unequivocal in his assessment.

“If you ask me if buying shares in sport clubs makes sense from an investment point of view, I would say no, definitely not. Not at all,” he told Børsen.

This was echoed by Johnny Madsen, the head of investments at the fund management company Dansk Formue- & Investeringspleje.

“Sports shares are generally invested in more with the heart than the head,” he told Børsen.

“Therefore it’s difficult to see the big picture from an investor’s point of view. But it all depends on the constellation in the new company.”

Excellent marketing tools
Torben Jensen, the head of HF, told Børsen that the experts had missed the point, as the envisaged product was not a conventional sports share.

“I can understand that there is scepticism when people hear about a sports share, but this is a marketing and consulting share,” he said.

Jensen explained that companies could use the sports clubs as a marketing tool by providing their customers with sports experiences.

“And the only place where you can really give unique experiences and full value for money is in the sports world,” he contended.

“Therefore we think sports clubs would be excellent marketing tools for enabling companies to attract customers, and that is why we want to buy sports clubs, so we can generate business.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”