121

News

Maersk eyeing climate-friendly benchmark

Christian Wenande
April 7th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Better planning and slow-steaming has helped Maersk save big in recent years

Slow-streaming has helped Maersk save billions in fuel consumption (photo: Maersk)

Thanks to larger ships, better planning and lower speeds (via slow-streaming), Maersk Line has reduced its fuel consumption by almost 40 percent since 2007.

The Danish oil and shipping giant aims to further reduce its fuel consumption by 60 percent, compared to 2007, by 2020.

“I can’t say for certain that we will make it, but we’ll try our hardest,” Søren Toft, Maersk Line’s chief operating officer, told Politiken newspaper.

“Our reductions must occur as we grow in the market. We will reduce our fuel consumption in real figures and relatively per transported container. We don’t just do it because we want to be responsible, it also helps with the bottom line.”

READ MORE: Maersk terminal operator plotting a new course or two

Huge savings 
In 2013 alone, Maersk saved about 4.3 billion kroner compared to the year before thanks to improved fuel consumption measures. In 2014, another 550 million kroner was shaved off fuel consumption expenses.

About 90 percent of all goods are transported by ships and the industry makes up about 3 percent of the global CO2 emissions.

“The transport sector is one of the most difficult areas to reduce CO2 emissions because you can’t just replace fuel with wind or sun energy,” Kirsten Halsnæs, a professor in climate and economics at the Technical University of Denmark, said.

“Meanwhile, there is more international trade, so it’s very commendable that they [Maersk] have set a target of reducing consumption by 60 percent. They will also save a lot of money doing so.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”