44

News

Royal Family could lose ancient hunting privileges

admin
March 25th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

The Environment Ministry is negotiating with the Royal House to limit its exclusive right to hunt in the country’s best forests

For 165 years, the Danish Royal Family have enjoyed exclusive hunting rights in 214 of Denmark’s best forests. Environmental agency Naturstyrelsen wants to see some of those forests opened up for rental to other hunters, thus bringing millions into the state treasury.

The royals' five to six hunts per year use less than a third of the area they hold exclusive rights to – an area larger than the island of Bornholm – according to research conducted by state broadcaster DR.

“It is unfair that the Royal Family hold exclusive rights to hunt in state forests,” MP Lisbeth Bech Poulsen told DR Nyheder. “It is high time those rights were taken away.”

Time to open things up
The Royal Family have for years rejected the possibility of renting forests to ordinary hunters, but Naturstyrelsen is now negotiating to get permission for other hunters to use some of the hunting grounds.

“It is too early to say which areas could be rented out,” Kirsten Brosbøl, the environment minister, told DR Nyheder.

The Royal Family have exclusive hunting rights to almost 64,000 hectares of the finest hunting areas in Denmark – nearly a third of all available hunting grounds. The rights were granted in civil law sections of the Danish Constitution dating back to 1849. The 214 lakes and forests they have exclusive rights to were decided in 1947 and have remained the same since.

Most of the lands never used
The figures researched by DR found that the Royal Family use less than one third of the area they have exclusive rights to.

“It goes without saying that the last 70 percent must be rented out,“ Enhedslisten spokesperson Per Clausen told DR Nyheder. “I want an explanation as to why it has not happened long ago.”

READ MORE: More state-owned areas opening up for hunting season

Minutes obtained by DR Nyheder of a meeting three weeks ago between representatives of the Royal Family and Naturstyrelsen show that the royals are for the first time open to the idea of renting out some of the prime hunting lands, provided any agreement struck allows them the flexibility to hunt where and when they chose.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”