85

News

Political majority wants Hizb ut-Tahrir banned

admin
February 26th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

State prosecutor Rigsadvokaten to look into possibilities

In the wake of the terrorist attack in Copenhagen earlier this month, a majority in parliament has agreed to look into the possibility of banning the Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir in Denmark.

With the backing of opposition parties Liberal Alliance, Venstre, Socialistisk Folkeparti, Dansk Folkeparti, and Enhedslisten, the justice minister, Mette Frederiksen, has asked the state prosecutor, Rigsadvokaten, to look into the possibility of banning the controversial organisation.

“My own opinion is that that organisation should be dissolved,” Frederiksen told Politiken newspaper. ”And the second that Rigsadvokaten finds grounds for dissolving them, it must happen.”

“Therefore, it's essential that Rigsadvokaten, based on the latest developments, evaluates whether there is a foundation present to dissolve Hizb ut-Tahrir.

Hizb ut-Tahrir – which has declared its goal to replace democratic society with a caliphate and establish the radical Islamic sharia law – has already been banned in a number of countries.

While most Muslim organisations in Denmark condemned the shootings that left two people dead (not including the shooting) and several policemen injured on February 14 and 15, Hizb ut-Tahrir refused to distance itself from the attack.

READ MORE: Anger over Mohammed film reaches Copenhagen

Second time lucky?
But banning Hizb ut-Tahrir will not be easy and the Danish government failed in its previous attempt to outlaw the organisation. 

In 2008, Rigsadvokaten concluded that it was not illegal for an organisation to work towards a goal that is fundamentally different from the existing order of society – such as a caliphate in Denmark.

Junes Kock, the spokesperson for Hizb ut-Tahrir, was perplexed at the government's proposal, which he refers to as “desperate”.

“It's well known throughout the world that we are an ideological political party that doesn't support violence. But we are in an election period and, after the tragic events of last week, they want to show decisiveness,” Kock told Politiken.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”