145

News

Danish-designed robot spanks Tonight Show host at beer pong

admin
February 25th, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

The versatile UR5 showcased its abilities versus Jimmy Fallon

'The Tonight Show' host Jimmy Fallon has become the latest person to take on a machine and fail.

In an episode of the popular talk show, Fallon challenged a robotic arm designed in Denmark to a game of beer pong: a drinking game popularised at American colleges where the aim is to throw table tennis balls into plastic cups from across a table. Unsurprisingly Fallon was comfortably beaten.

The accurate ping-pong-ball-throwing robotic arm, nicknamed UR5, was manufactured by Universal Robots in Funen with a special grip added by the US firm Empire Robotics.

A versatile bot
Esben Hallundbæk Østergaard, a former researcher at Syddansk Universitet who is one of the UR5’s main developers, explains why Fallon and co used their robot on the show.

“It is no surprise they chose our robot to play beer pong with, seeing as it is very easy to move around” Østergaard told Videnskab.dk. “Furthermore, it is also easy to program."

The UR5 was designed to meet the demands of a small, flexible industrial robot that was easy to calibrate. But since its inception in 2010, it has been used for a much wider range of functions.

These include an appearance as a surgical robot in the sci-fi series 'Extant', and assisting the Danish queen with her ribbon-cutting duties during the inauguration of a new centre at the Technological Institute.

READ MORE: The electricity-producing robot that wants your urine … and possibly your job

Safety is key
But what really sets the UR5 apart from the competition is that it is very safe to operate.

“We have the only robot in the world with safety settings so advanced, that in nearly 80 percent of cases it doesn’t require shielding,” Henrik Gordon Petersen, a professor at Syddansk Universitet involved in the early design phase of UR5, explained to Videnskab.dk

“First of all, it is small in size, but more important are the advanced safety settings that switch it off as soon as it encounters unexpected resistance.”

Check out the clip of the beer pong game in YouTube below.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”