94

News

Energy-efficient appliances: Worth the premium

admin
January 23rd, 2015


This article is more than 9 years old.

Energy agency study shows that it pays to buy green

Consumers should pay more attention to the EU’s energy labels if they want to save money, as buying cheaper domestic appliances that use more energy can be a false economy. This is the message from the energy agency Energistyrelsen following a study of the relationship between the price and energy consumption of various domestic appliances.

Savings equivalent to the difference in price between an appliance with an A++ rating and one with an A+ rating can be made in just four to six years.

The climate, energy and building minister, Rasums Helveg Petersen, said that the message was clear. “Buying a power-hungry appliance is like cutting a hole in your trouser pocket – money will pour out, ” he said.

“A modern fridge or oven can easily work for up to 10-15 years, so a bit of mental arithmetic shows that electricity consumption is important when you invest in new domestic appliances.”

Reduces emissions
The exact savings over time vary depending on the type of appliance – ovens take just two years to justify the extra cost of an A++ rating while tumble driers take nine years – but Petersen argues that saving money isn’t the only factor.

“The EU’s energy labelling scheme is simple and effective: it helps consumers save on their electricity bill, encourages manufacturers to make more energy-efficient machines and spares the climate from greenhouse gas emissions,” he said.

“The study also shows that Danes to a great extent have adopted energy-saving domestic appliances.”

For example, in the past two years the sales of washing machines with A++ ratings have tripled.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”