60

News

Climate deal reached; some issues left unresolved

admin
December 15th, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

Negotiations in Lima pave way for larger deal in Paris

The climate, energy and building minister has downplayed the impact of the deal reached in the UN climate talks in Lima on Sunday, which concluded two weeks of talks and negotiations that ran past deadline into the weekend.

”With this agreement in Lima we have taken a small step in the fight against climate change,” Rasmus Helveg Petersen said in a press release.

”But I'm going to keep my work clothes on because we need to increase the level of ambition if we are to win the battle against climate change.”

Crucial sticking point
The talks, which were scheduled to end on Friday, carried on until Sunday as frustration mounted over one particular issue: whether and how developing nations should take on obligations to cut emissions, and if that would be any different from the obligations set for developed nations.

READ MORE: "We must act now," urges climate minister following IPCC report

The Climate, Energy and Building Ministry's statement notes a ”sharp division” between what developed and developing countries are responsible for, and that ”global growth in energy use and emissions in the future will take place in the major emerging markets rather than in the traditional industrialised countries”.

”We must reach an ambitious climate agreement next year in Paris in which all countries must contribute to reducing CO2 emissions,” Petersen said. ”It will not be easy.”

Decisions agreed, agendas launched
Christiana Figueres, the conference executive secretary, admitted the meetings were ”very, very challenging”, but noted the negotiations ended with ”a range of key decisions agreed [upon] and action-agendas launched”.

Denmark was one of the 196 countries represented at the talks. The COP20 deal is meant to be a precursor and initial outline to a future deal to be agreed upon in Paris in December 2015 to reduce global emissions, which is intended to take effect in 2020. 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”