120

News

Did its tough stance on rare earth minerals cost the opposition the Greenlandic election?

admin
December 1st, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

Narrow victory keeps business-orientated government in power

Greenland's ruling Siumut party narrowly won the unscheduled elections that were called two months ago when its leader, the former premier Aleqa Hammond, was forced to resign amid allegations that she misused public funds.

The results on Saturday confirmed that the incumbent party beat the left-leaning Inuit Ataqatigiit (IA) by 326 public votes, which means Kim Kielsen will continue as premier – a post he has filled since Hammond's departure.

On an island where low-commodity prices have left ballyhooed mining projects languishing, analysts had predicted that the party with the strongest economic message would emerge victorious. 

As close as it gets
Siumut promised to lower corporate taxes and revitalise the country’s sagging economy and captured 34.3 percent of the vote, while IA, led by Sara Olsvig, won 33.2 percent. 

Both parties won the same amount of seats in Greenland’s self-rule parliament – 11 each out of a total of 31. 

Although Olsvig said she would keep an “open mind” when it came to negotiating with Siumut, Kielsen will need to negotiate with some of the smaller parties to form a coalition government. 

READ MORE: Greenland’s premier caught up in financial scandal

Naleraq – a new party led by former premier Hans Enoksen, which split from Siumut in January – took 11 percent of the vote. 

Stability the key
Continuing with a Siumut-led government will be seen as bringing at least some sense of stability to foreign investors looking to reap the benefits of Greenland’s vast natural resources. 

Last year, the government lifted a ban on uranium mining, opening the door to rare earth projects that often generate uranium as a byproduct.

IA opposed the lifting of the ban and Olsvig pledged to bring a halt to uranium mining.

A solid turnout
Despite promises of a prosperous future, Greeland’s population of 56,000 are still facing poverty and a 10 percent unemployment rate. 

Siumut promised to diversify the economy to boost fishing and tourism in an attempt to make the country less dependent on volatile commodities markets.

Some 29,500 of the 40,000 eligible voters in Greenland voted – a turnout of above 70 percent.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”