65

News

Tobacco giants wins historic case against ex-smoker

admin
November 20th, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

House of Prince and Skandinavisk Holding off the hook

The Supreme Courts have ruled in favour of the Scandinavian tobacco giants House of Prince and Skandinavisk Holding in a historic case involving an ex-smoker.

Allan Lykke Jensen, an ex-smoker who puffed away for over 50 years, sued what was then called Skandinavisk Tobakskompagni ten years ago, accusing them of a number of irregularities, including adding a number of addictive substances to their cigarettes during production.

"I don't agree with the decision,” Jensen told TV2 News. "The companies knew that I would become ill smoking, and I vehemently disagree that Prince hasn't been misleading regarding the amount of tar and nicotine in each packet.”

READ MORE: More Danes leaning towards banning tobacco sales

2 million kroner taxpayer bill
The Funen man contends that the tobacco producers cheated with their measurements so that there was actually more tar and nicotine in the cigarettes than was printed on the cigarette boxes.

Jensen, 67, initially demanded 53,000 kroner in compensation, but in December 2011, the Eastern High Court ruled he would not get compensation for the damage that the cigarettes had caused.

Jensen appealed the decision to the Supreme Court in 2012.

The state will foot the bill of the court costs, which have grown to over two million kroner over the past decade.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”