381

Business

Trust, freedom and resources for innovative research

Philip Tees
November 16th, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

German scientist Martin Münzel tells us about his workplace

Martin Münzel, a research scientist at Novo Nordisk (photo: Novo Nordisk)

What is your job title and what does a typical day at work comprise?
I am a research scientist in the diabetes research unit at Novo Nordisk. More specifically I work in protein and peptide chemistry. We are the guys who  design and synthesise new drugs – of course with the help and input of a lot of other people from other departments.

A typical day at work would start with reading the latest emails, checking the literature for new findings and, most importantly, checking if there have been interesting new results from our in-house tests. Then I would either work in the lab, go to a meeting or sit down at my desk and think about interesting new things to make.

How long have you been at Novo Nordisk and what were you doing before?
I have been at Novo Nordisk for about two years now. This is my first ‘real’ job; before I have been working at different universities in Germany, the UK and the United States (Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich, Oxford University and the University of California in Berkeley) as a PhD student and as a postdoc.

Novo Nordisk recently came in second place in the Science Careers Top Employers Survey. What do you think makes a good employer in the scientific field?
I guess most researchers are interested in the science part of their job, so a good employer gives its scientists trust, freedom and resources to do good and innovative research, rather than forcing people to do what everybody (or at least the competitors) are doing. Additionally, a pleasant working atmosphere and a challenging but realistic workload creates motivated employees.

I can imagine that Germany and Denmark are in some ways similar and in others very different – what are the most striking similarities and differences? Was there anything about working at Novo Nordisk, or working in Denmark in general, that surprised you when you started?
Having also worked in the UK and the US, I must say that Germany and Denmark are the countries where the mentality is most alike, but of course there are differences. I personally feel that there is very strong consensus-culture in Denmark.

From Germany I am used to much harder scientific discussions, where people tend to immediately point to the possible problems of new ideas. This is not to talk other people’s ideas down or to prevent innovation; it is rather intended to prevent someone from following a path that has not been completely thought through.

Through talking to many devil’s advocates you just sharpen your ideas, but it is important not to take scientific critique personally. Here, people focus much more on the positive side and you are very much encouraged to try and to pursue new ideas. Both approaches work and both have their upsides, but I sometimes miss somebody telling me “I think this is a bad idea …”

Denmark markets itself as being a good environment for research and science – in your opinion, does it succeed in attracting and retaining the best brains?
There surely is a good environment for research and science, which can be seen by the success of companies such as Novo Nordisk, but I think it is maybe a little short-sighted to only look at Denmark.

Although this idea is maybe not too popular in all parts of Danish society, I think Denmark has to open up more towards Europe and not only focus on the possible downsides of a pan-European labour market. I think that surprisingly many Danish politicians talk way too much about welfare tourism (how big of a problem in Denmark is it actually?) and not enough about the opportunity to welcome much-appreciated highly qualified people. Denmark already has the strictest immigration policies in the EU and I think the country should be cautious not to scare the wrong people away.

On the other hand, many innovative Danish companies are doing an excellent job in providing attractive jobs, which is the key to getting and retaining the best brains. And one other thing – one should not be afraid of the high taxes. Scientists do not choose their job primarily for the pay, and if you look at the whole package (tax, health insurance and social insurance), the German tax burden is not lower than the Danish one – at least if you don’t earn several million a year.

What do you like most about working for Novo Nordisk?
I like that I have the freedom to try my own ideas in exciting projects, and besides this there is also time for a private life.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”