187

Business

The Pension Jungle: Your money – their money. Can we trust the politicians?

admin
November 2nd, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

Steen has vast experience as a pension and benefit strategy consultant for major international corporations and high-flying individuals. He was the managing director of Mercer when they first opened an office in Denmark. He possesses a profound understanding of different pension cultures. He is a truly independent professional and blogs at pensions-junglen.dk.

Will the money be there for you one day? Well, that depends on your viewpoint. Danes don’t have a tradition for employer-sponsored retirement plans granting future benefits. 

It is more a case of you paying some and your employer paying some. Fundamentally it is all your money. Even the employer part – it is a part of your total remuneration. The money is deposited in your pension account, under your name. It follows you automatically during your working life. A simple and reassuring arrangement.


(Photo: Colourbox)

Not so simple
However there is a third party. The state. Or the politicians who run things. They think they have a share in your pension money. Why? Because contributing for later retirement is generally supported by tax deductions. Some 40 percent of the accumulated 4,000 billion kroner of pension savings will fall back to the state in the form of taxes.  

The politicians think the state suffers a cash outlay. Some of this money would be nice to have right now. “The money actually belongs to the state,” are words we hear more and more.

Rocking the boat
There should be a broader understanding here. It takes some incentive to make working men and women bind part of their cash remuneration for many decades. All states know this, and we see all kinds of tax incentives around the world. Paying a low tax on annual returns might be enough incentive, but remember, most states do not tax these annual returns at all.

It is rocking the boat when the state starts tempting pension savers to pay their taxes prematurely at a lower tax rate of 37.3 percent.

Resist temptation
Real sustainability lies in the fact that future taxes on pension savings paid in due course is a guarantee that the state has future income to fund other commitments such as the state social security, folkepension.

Lump sum pensions will soon be a thing of the past, by which time the Danish state will have engulfed 80 billion kroner in premature pension taxes. Let the temptation to bring forward more taxation on pensions stop here.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”