27

News

SAS required to pay for disabled costs

admin
October 14th, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

Supreme Court denies airline’s attempt to dodge bill

SAS is required to pay a 20 million kroner bill related to the cost of assisting disabled passengers at Copenhagen Airport.

The Supreme Court found the airline liable for the bill yesterday, thus exhausting all of SAS’s avenues of appeal.

The dispute arose after changes in EU rules that actually require airports, not airlines, to pay for services supplied to disabled passengers. 

Court costs add up
However, the rules did allow airports to impose a tariff on airlines for the cost of disability services. SAS has fought vigorously against paying that tax.

The Supreme Court reached the same decision as the High Court did in February 2013 – that SAS is liable for the fees. 

READ MORE: SAS did not receive illegal state aid, EU concludes

The various court cases have now added over one million kroner in costs to the total bill that SAS will now be forced to pay.

 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”