89

News

Chef’s son found guilty of animal cruelty

admin
October 14th, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

Camilla Plum’s son and his accomplice slaughtered a pony on a beach in 2013

Carl Plum, the son of noted chef Camilla Plum, has been found guilty of animal cruelty for first slitting the throat of a pony named Tarzan on Tisvildeleje Beach in northern Zealand in the summer of 2013, and then decapitating it.

Plum and a companion were convicted of violations of the Animal Welfare Act and the Weapons Act, along with the unlawful slaughter of an animal. 

The weapons conviction relates to the knife that was used to kill and behead the pony.

A deliberate act
The pony belonged to Camila Plum, who found its head in her garden and reported it to the police.

Both Plum and his accomplice were sentenced to 30 days in prison and ordered to pay court costs.

Plum was not present when her son's sentence was handed down.

READ MORE: Three charged with pony decapitation

Judge Torben Hvid said the three lay judges who assessed the case found that the killing of the pony was a deliberate act that the two suspects had committed in co-operation with one another.

“This was a carefully planned and co-operative project,” said the judge when passing judgement. “Tasks relating to the slaughter of this pony were broken down and planned.”

Defendants launch appeal
Hvid said the animal had endured "quite significant suffering for no particular reason”.

However, it was not recommended that Plum and his friend be forced to stay away from animals in the future.

“Once the sentence is served, there is no reason to believe they will do something similar again,” said Hvid. 

Both Plum and his co-defendant have already appealed against the verdict, which could take the case to the High Court.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”