71

Business

Danish companies dominate public procurement at home, but struggle in the EU

admin
October 3rd, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

EU figures reveal tender disparities

Based on analysis of the EU’s public procurement database, the Danish export association Eksportforeningen believes that Denmark isn’t getting enough out of the EU single market, Ugebrevet A4 reports. However, Danish companies win the vast majority of Danish contracts put out to tender.

Of 50,000 EU tenders abroad, Danish companies won just 43 between July 2013 and July 2014. In contrast, Danish companies won 95 percent of Danish tenders in the same period.

Missing opportunities
According to EU rules, all public procurement orders in excess of a certain amount, which varies depending on the sector, must be put out to a tender that can be competed for by all businesses registered in the EU.

Regarding the tenders in other parts of the EU, Ulrik Dahlm, the head of Eksortforeningen, told Ugebrevet A4 that Danish companies are missing out on opportunities.

“It’s a fundamental problem that we, as a member state of the EU, don’t get as big a slice of the pie,” he said.

“It’s definitely untapped potential. There are worryingly few companies that are eyeing the possibilities.”

Some Danish companies experience protectionism when competing for EU tenders.

Ole Quist Pedersen, a senior public affairs manager at Falck, said that it was often a problem to get judged on the same basis as local companies.

“It comes from the fact that some countries want a particular supplier, preferably a domestic company,” he said.

“Foreign companies are made to seem suspicious.”

Denmark paying over the odds
But when it comes to Denmark’s own public procurement, it is a different story.

Reliance on Danish domestic companies in these cases can push up the cost of public services, Kenneth Skov Jensen, a manager of the Danish competition and consumer authority, warned.

“The consequence of only having Danish offers can be that you pay a higher price,” he said.

“The rule of thumb is that the more offers you get, the lower the price.”

Language difficulties can be a problem for foreign companies securing tenders in Denmark.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”