145

Opinion

There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch

September 12th, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

The universities in Denmark are now open for business following the summer break.

At International House we see a long line of students waiting to be served with their CPR number and other essentials that will enable them to integrate into the Danish environment for as long as it takes. They are from all over the world.  Education has become a big business. 

But is Denmark missing a trick? While some students from outside the EU and EFTA (regions that qualify for free education) are willing to pay the exorbitant prices the universities charge for the more than 700 different courses of study on offer, surely more would if they were able to lower their prices. 

The universities need the fee-paying students to balance their own budgets, but isn’t it about time the government removed this burdensome worry and helped them to run as efficiently and profitably as possible and prosper in a competitive market by charging the locals as well.

After all, 40 percent of all higher education is now conducted in English – a language that is already prevalent across the country’s universities. 

It makes one wonder if some sort of tuition fee should also apply to everyone. If fees were evened out they would be more attractive for global talent. 

Besides, the word is that the global students are outperforming the locals.  Could that be because a number of the local students are not really motivated?

Record numbers applied for higher education places this year, but would so many be interested if there was a fair tuition fee to be paid?

The country needs an influx of talent, and that talent is to be found worldwide. Introducing a modest tuition fee for EU and EFTA students could be used to bring down the cost of tuition fees for global students – particularly when you factor in the high living costs, like rent (see page 2).

Our price for the free lunch is inequality and inefficiency and – what is worse – some of that talent is going where they can afford it, which is not where we want them. 

If we want world class education, we need to attract world-class students. Not with a free lunch, because there ain’t no such thing, but with a fair competitive and attractive environment for the production of future Nobel Prize winners. 

About


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”