93

Business

Maersk accused of forgoing ethical guidelines

admin
July 2nd, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

The Danish giant refuses to accept responsibility

The Danish shipping giant Maersk Line has been accused by a NGO of not living up to its own ethical guidelines when it comes to the scrapping of its ships.

Last year, three former Maersk ships were scrapped at Alang Beach near Mumbai, India, by impoverished migrant workers in dangerous conditions.

In 2011, Maersk sold the ships to a Greek shipping company, Diana Shipping, and then chartered them back for two years. Diana Shipping then sent the ships to be scrapped at Alang Beach when the contract expired.

“And that means that Maersk is in conflict with its own ethical guidelines that state the company’s ships must be scrapped responsibly,” Patrizia Heidegger, the head of the NGO Shipbreaking Platform, told DR Nyheder.

READ MORE: Maersk pulls out of P3 network after China rejection

Not our problem
Heidegger contends that Maersk has a responsibility to ensure that the new owners of its ships should scrap the ships responsibly – something that Maersk disagrees with.

“We take responsibility for the ships we own,” Jacob Sterling, the head of sustainability at Maersk, said.

“We believe that the responsibility for the ships we sell passes on to the new owner, as is the case if I sold my car.”

Nordic giants
In related news, Maersk has been listed as being the second-largest Nordic company based on net turnover by the analysis firm Largest Companies.

With a net turnover of 265 billion kroner in 2013, Maersk was only surpassed by the Norwegian oil company Statoil, which had a monster turnover of 562 billion kroner.

The six other Danish companies in the top 30 were OW Bunker (11), Novo Nordisk (16), ISS (19), Arla Foods (24), Dong Energy (27) and Carlsberg (30).


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”