28

News

Lego won’t be the face of Scottish No vote

admin
June 11th, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

Toy company reacts to British government’s political use of its figurines

Ahead of the referendum on Scottish independence in September, the 'No' campaign has been criticised and the British government forced to change an online campaign following complaints by Lego that its figurines were misused. 

The British Treasury had posted an article in which it proposed that independence would cost each Scot £1,400 (13,000 kroner) per year. The article went on to suggest how Scots could put this money to ‘better use’. For example, they were told they could instead “share a meal of fish and chips with your family every day for around 10 weeks” or “scoff 280 hotdogs at the Edinburgh Festival".

Emma Owen, a PR and promotions manager for Lego, told Politiken newspaper that Lego is “politically neutral” and did not give permission for any of its images to be used. “It’s a political message we didn’t want to be associated with, and that’s that,” she said.

Patronising?
A Treasury source told the Guardian that the article should be taken in a light-hearted way and that it was “good to communicate with people in different ways”.

But it has received fierce criticism from the 'Yes' movement. The Scottish National Party (SNP) financial affairs spokesman Stewart Hosie told the BBC that the list was based on "bogus figures".

Vonny Moyes, the comedy editor of Scottish arts magazine The Skinny, explained to the Guardian, with a hint of sarcasm,  how Scots could perceive the campaign as patronising.

"Not only have the UK government dangled a wee battered carrot in front of us,” she said.

“Given the shocking numeracy rates of your average chippy-munching Scot, they've kindly explained what £1,400 means in real terms. Who needs self-determination when you can drown in hotdogs?”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”